DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Expedition vs 1995 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExpeditionModelMustang
1996Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
232 HPPower218 HP
441 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank58 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size225/55 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5200 mmLength4610 mm
2000 mmWidth1823 mm
1900 mmHeight1341 mm
—Weight1566 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Expedition and 1995 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…