DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Expedition vs 2001 Holden Suburban Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
ExpeditionModelSuburban
2003Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats9
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5735 cc
263 HPPower255 HP
474 NmTorque330 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank158 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption18 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5228 mmLength5588 mm
2000 mmWidth1956 mm
1971 mmHeight1803 mm
2520 KgWeight2121 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase3340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Expedition and 2001 Holden Suburban approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…