DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Expedition vs 2003 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ExpeditionModelArmada
1999Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
165 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
264 HPPower305 HP
474 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
113 ltFuel tank106 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
265/70 R17Tyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5198 mmLength5255 mm
1996 mmWidth2002 mm
1992 mmHeight1913 mm
2555 KgWeight2340 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Expedition and 2003 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…