DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Expedition vs 2003 Lincoln Navigator Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Navigator

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
ExpeditionModelNavigator
1999Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
165 km/hTop speed190 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5408 cc
264 HPPower300 HP
474 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
113 ltFuel tank106 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption21,4 lt
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption18,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size255/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5198 mmLength5232 mm
1996 mmWidth2000 mm
1992 mmHeight1975 mm
2555 KgWeight2718 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase3018 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Expedition and 2003 Lincoln Navigator approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Navigator leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…