DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Expedition vs 2002 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCadillac
ExpeditionModelEscalade
2003Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
170 km/hTop speed177 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5736 cc
263 HPPower258 HP
474 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank114 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
13,9 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre sizeP265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5228 mmLength5116 mm
2000 mmWidth1956 mm
1971 mmHeight1905 mm
2645 KgWeight2605 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase2985 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Expedition and 2002 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…