DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Expedition vs 1999 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExpeditionModelExpedition
2003Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
235 HPPower243 HP
394 NmTorque397 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5228 mmLength5197 mm
2000 mmWidth1996 mm
1971 mmHeight1887 mm
2455 KgWeight2280 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Expedition and 1999 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…