2000 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.8 TD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Ford Escort vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.6 (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
EscortModelPolo
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
170 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
180 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4136 mmLength4164 mm
1700 mmWidth1640 mm
1381 mmHeight1414 mm
1250 KgWeight1080 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2441 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Escort and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…