1996 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.8 TD (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
1996 Ford Escort vs 1996 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 16V (100 Hp) 1996Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
EscortModelPolo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
172 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
180 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4293 mmLength3715 mm
1700 mmWidth1655 mm
1394 mmHeight1420 mm
1155 KgWeight1025 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Escort and 1996 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…