DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Ford Escort vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford EscortSpecificationAudi 80
FordMakeAudi
EscortModel80
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4+1Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Ford EscortSpecificationAudi 80
10,6 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
186 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
105 HPPower70 HP
135 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford EscortSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford EscortSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13; 185/60 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Ford EscortSpecificationAudi 80
4036 mmLength4405 mm
1692 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1395 mm
1050 KgWeight1030 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Ford Escort and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…