DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Escort vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
EscortModelClio
1995Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
166 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1391 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
106 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size175/70 R13; 175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4036 mmLength4150 mm
1692 mmWidth1639 mm
1379 mmHeight1416 mm
1105 KgWeight940 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Escort and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…