DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Escort vs 1997 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRover
EscortModelMini MK
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

16,8 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
154 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
103 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R13 TTyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4104 mmLength3100 mm
1691 mmWidth1440 mm
1398 mmHeight1350 mm
1005 KgWeight700 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Escort and 1997 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…