2013 • Ford
Edge
Ford Edge 3.7 V6 (305 Hp) 2013Overall Score76.5/100
2013 Ford Edge vs 2015 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.6 V6 (245 Hp) 2015Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Ford Edge
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EdgeSpecificationHolden UTE
FordMakeHolden
EdgeModelUTE
2013Model year2015
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Ford EdgeSpecificationHolden UTE
8,0 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3721 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
305 HPPower245 HP
380 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EdgeSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,2 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EdgeSpecificationHolden UTE
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/65 R17; 245/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EdgeSpecificationHolden UTE
4679 mmLength5055 mm
1930 mmWidth1899 mm
1702 mmHeight1497 mm
—Weight1697 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase3009 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Ford Edge and 2015 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Edge leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…