DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Ford EcoSport vs 2013 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFiat
EcoSportModelBravo
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
160 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
205 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank58 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
205/60 R16 92H; 205/50 R17 93WTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4273 mmLength4336 mm
1765 mmWidth1792 mm
1648 mmHeight1498 mm
1384 KgWeight1180 kg
—Luggage capacity400 lt
2519 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog Lights

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Ford EcoSport and 2013 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…