DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford EcoSport vs 2016 Volkswagen Up! Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford EcoSport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
EcoSportModelUp!
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
125 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque160 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16 92H; 205/50 R17 93WTyre size175/65 R14; 185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4273 mmLength3600 mm
1765 mmWidth1641 mm
1648 mmHeight1504 mm
1350 KgWeight927 Kg
2519 mmWheelbase2407 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford EcoSport and 2016 Volkswagen Up! approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford EcoSport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…