2005 • Alpina
B3
Alpina B3 3.3 i 24V B3S (305 Hp) 2005Overall Score82.5/100
2005 Alpina B3 vs 2004 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2004Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Alpina B3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B3SpecificationNissan Cedric
AlpinaMakeNissan
B3ModelCedric
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Alpina B3SpecificationNissan Cedric
5,4 s0–100 km/h—
270 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3346 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
305 HPPower280 HP
362 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B3SpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption18 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B3SpecificationNissan Cedric
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18Tyre size205/60 R16 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B3SpecificationNissan Cedric
4471 mmLength4860 mm
1739 mmWidth1770 mm
1414 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1660 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Alpina B3 and 2004 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…