DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Econoline vs 2000 Nissan Patrol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Patrol

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
EconolineModelPatrol
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement4169 cc
193 HPPower145 HP
331 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
132 ltFuel tank95 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption20 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4395 mm
2014 mmWidth1840 mm
2050 mmHeight1840 mm
2370 KgWeight2320 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Econoline and 2000 Nissan Patrol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Patrol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…