DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Crown Victoria vs 2004 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
Crown VictoriaModelMustang
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
6Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,5 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
242 HPPower263 HP
389 NmTorque302 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank59 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/55 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5385 mmLength4653 mm
1986 mmWidth1857 mm
1443 mmHeight1350 mm
1905 KgWeight1550 Kg
2913 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Crown Victoria and 2004 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…