DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Crown Victoria vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
Crown VictoriaModelMustang
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
6Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
227 HPPower228 HP
369 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank58 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5385 mmLength4635 mm
1986 mmWidth1820 mm
1443 mmHeight1360 mm
1875 KgWeight1550 Kg
2913 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Crown Victoria and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…