DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Cougar vs 2000 Ford Cougar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
CougarModelCougar
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
225 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2544 ccEngine displacement2544 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
220 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4700 mm
1770 mmWidth1770 mm
1320 mmHeight1320 mm
1390 KgWeight1390 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Cougar and 2000 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…