2002 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.0i 16V (131 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Ford Cougar vs 2002 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford CougarSpecificationRover 25
FordMakeRover
CougarModel25
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Ford CougarSpecificationRover 25
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
209 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower113 HP
178 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford CougarSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford CougarSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford CougarSpecificationRover 25
4700 mmLength3990 mm
1777 mmWidth1688 mm
1320 mmHeight1419 mm
1315 KgWeight1130 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Cougar and 2002 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…