1998 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i 24V GL (165 Hp) 1998Overall Score68.25/100
1998 Ford Contour vs 1998 Volvo V70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.4 T (200 Hp) 1998Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationVolvo V70
FordMakeVolvo
ContourModelV70
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationVolvo V70
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
165 HPPower200 HP
217 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption13,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationVolvo V70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R14VTyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationVolvo V70
4658 mmLength4733 mm
1749 mmWidth1860 mm
1374 mmHeight1562 mm
1400 KgWeight1630 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2763 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Ford Contour and 1998 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…