1998 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.0i 16V (132 Hp) 1998Overall Score62.25/100
1998 Ford Contour vs 1998 Saab 9-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.0i T SE (150 Hp) 1998Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationSaab 9-5
FordMakeSaab
ContourModel9-5
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationSaab 9-5
—0–100 km/h11,6 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
132 HPPower150 HP
174 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationSaab 9-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationSaab 9-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 VTyre size205/65 R15; 215/55 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationSaab 9-5
4658 mmLength4805 mm
1749 mmWidth1792 mm
1374 mmHeight1449 mm
1320 KgWeight1535 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2703 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Ford Contour and 1998 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…