DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford C-Max vs 2017 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
C-MaxModelTrafic
2017Model year2017
MpvBody typeMinivan
—Seats9
—Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
188 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
159 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4379 mmLength4999 mm
1858 mmWidth1956 mm
1610 mmHeight1971 mm
1374 kgWeight1807 Kg
432 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase3098 mm

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford C-Max and 2017 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…