2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Trend 2016 1.5 182 HPOverall Score75.5/100
2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Buick Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Buick
Cascada
Buick Cascada 1.6 Ecotec (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Buick Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBuick Cascada
FordMakeBuick
C-MaxModelCascada
2016Model year2016
MpvBody typeCabriolet
—Seats4
—Doors2
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBuick Cascada
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
213 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
182 HPPower200 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBuick Cascada
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBuick Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ATTransmission—
16Tyre size245/40 R20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBuick Cascada
4379 mmLength4696 mm
1858 mmWidth1839 mm
1610 mmHeight1447 mm
1413 kgWeight1805 Kg
432 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2695 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Buick Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…