2010 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Grand 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (140 Hp) 2010Overall Score53.5/100
2010 Ford C-Max vs 2009 Mazda Tribute Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.3i (133 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Tribute
FordMakeMazda
C-MaxModelTribute
2010Model year2009
MPVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Tribute
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
140 HPPower133 HP
320 NmTorque263 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Tribute
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda Tribute
4520 mmLength4557 mm
1828 mmWidth1806 mm
1684 mmHeight1784 mm
1575 KgWeight—
—Wheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford C-Max and 2009 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…