2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (140 Hp) 2015Overall Score58.5/100
2015 Ford C-Max vs 2017 Kia Forte Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Kia
Forte
Kia Forte 2.0 GDI (164 Hp) 2017Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Kia Forte
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationKia Forte
FordMakeKia
C-MaxModelForte
2015Model year2017
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationKia Forte
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
140 HPPower164 HP
320 NmTorque205 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationKia Forte
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationKia Forte
4380 mmLength4560 mm
1828 mmWidth1780 mm
1626 mmHeight1430 mm
1488 KgWeight1374 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford C-Max and 2017 Kia Forte approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Forte leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…