2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Ford C-Max vs 2004 Toyota Porte Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Porte
Toyota Porte 1.5i (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Porte
FordMakeToyota
C-MaxModelPorte
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Porte
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Porte
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Porte
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Porte
4330 mmLength3990 mm
1820 mmWidth1690 mm
1600 mmHeight1720 mm
1292 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford C-Max and 2004 Toyota Porte approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…