2010 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Duratorq TDCi (95 Hp) 2010Overall Score45/100
2010 Ford C-Max vs 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 MPI (143 Hp) 2008Overall Score46/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
45–46
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
FordMakeMitsubishi
C-MaxModelLancer
2010Model year2008
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
13,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
170 km/hTop speed196 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
95 HPPower143 HP
230 NmTorque178 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank59 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4380 mmLength4585 mm
1828 mmWidth1760 mm
1626 mmHeight1515 mm
1390 KgWeight1430 Kg
—Wheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford C-Max and 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…