DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford C-Max vs 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
C-MaxModelLancer
2015Model year2010
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
184 km/hTop speed204 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
115 HPPower143 HP
270 NmTorque178 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank59 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4570 mm
1828 mmWidth1760 mm
1626 mmHeight1505 mm
1390 KgWeight1290 Kg
—Wheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford C-Max and 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…