2012 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Duratorq TDCi (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score49/100
2012 Ford C-Max vs 2017 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Trend 2017 1.6 TDCi 115 HPOverall Score67.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 18.25 points.
49–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
FordMakeFord
C-MaxModelC-Max
2012Model year2017
MPVBody typeMpv
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
11,3 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
184 km/hTop speed184 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
4380 mmLength4379 mm
1828 mmWidth1858 mm
1626 mmHeight1610 mm
1390 KgWeight1390 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford C-Max and 2017 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 18.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…