2012 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Duratorq TDCi (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score49/100
2012 Ford C-Max vs 2009 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.
49–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
FordMakeFord
C-MaxModelC-Max
2012Model year2009
MPVBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
11,3 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
184 km/hTop speed175 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
270 NmTorque143 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
4380 mmLength4372 mm
1828 mmWidth1825 mm
1626 mmHeight1595 mm
1390 KgWeight1344 Kg
—Wheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford C-Max and 2009 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…