2012 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Duratorq TDCi (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score49/100
2012 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Fiat Egea HB Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Fiat
Egea HB
Fiat Egea HB Easy Plus 2016 1.6 Multijet 120 HPOverall Score71.75/100
WINNER
Fiat Egea HB
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 22.75 points.
49–71.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFiat Egea HB
FordMakeFiat
C-MaxModelEgea HB
2012Model year2016
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFiat Egea HB
11,3 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
184 km/hTop speed200 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
270 NmTorque320 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFiat Egea HB
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFiat Egea HB
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionDCT
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationFiat Egea HB
4380 mmLength4368 mm
1828 mmWidth1792 mm
1626 mmHeight1495 mm
1390 KgWeight1320 kg
—Luggage capacity440 lt
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford C-Max and 2016 Fiat Egea HB approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Egea HB leads the E-Kıyasla score by 22.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…