DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Alpina B3 vs 1995 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.5–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeMitsubishi
B3ModelGTO
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h—
255 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
250 HPPower280 HP
320 NmTorque417 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/40 R17; 265/35 R17Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4575 mm
1698 mmWidth1840 mm
1373 mmHeight1285 mm
1330 KgWeight1710 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Alpina B3 and 1995 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…