2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.5 TDCi (120 Hp) 2015Overall Score62.25/100
2015 Ford C-Max vs 2015 Brilliance V3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Brilliance
V3
Brilliance V3 1.5 (112 Hp) 2015Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBrilliance V3
FordMakeBrilliance
C-MaxModelV3
2015Model year2015
MPVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBrilliance V3
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
120 HPPower112 HP
270 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBrilliance V3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBrilliance V3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationBrilliance V3
4379 mmLength4200 mm
1828 mmWidth1790 mm
1626 mmHeight1600 mm
1405 KgWeight1350 Kg
—Wheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford C-Max and 2015 Brilliance V3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…