2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.5 TDCi (120 Hp) 2015Overall Score62.25/100
2015 Ford C-Max vs 1998 Mazda 626 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 (136 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.
62.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 626
FordMakeMazda
C-MaxModel626
2015Model year1998
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 626
11,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
184 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
120 HPPower136 HP
270 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMazda 626
4379 mmLength4574 mm
1828 mmWidth1710 mm
1626 mmHeight1430 mm
1405 KgWeight1250 Kg
—Wheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford C-Max and 1998 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…