DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Bronco vs 2000 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
BroncoModelMark
1995Model year2000
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
3Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
5766 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
203 HPPower232 HP
407 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
121 ltFuel tank68 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
18,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4663 mmLength5265 mm
2009 mmWidth1900 mm
1892 mmHeight1360 mm
—Weight1730 Kg
2659 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Bronco and 2000 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…