DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alpina B3 vs 2013 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
AlpinaMakeJaguar
B3ModelXJ
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4,2 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
305 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
410 HPPower340 HP
600 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank82 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8
245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4628 mmLength5127 mm
1811 mmWidth1899 mm
1409 mmHeight1456 mm
1610 KgWeight1748 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase3032 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alpina B3 and 2013 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…