2016 • Ford
B-Max
Ford B-Max Titanium 2016 1.6 105 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2016 Ford B-Max vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI (105 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
B-MaxModelPolo
2016Model year2016
MpvBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5
Performance
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
12,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
182 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
150 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption4,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,4 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption3,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
PowerShiftTransmission—
15Tyre size215/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4077 mmLength3972 mm
1751 mmWidth1682 mm
1604 mmHeight1453 mm
1309 kgWeight1090 Kg
304 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2470 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford B-Max and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…