DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford B-Max vs 2016 MG MG3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MG3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

52.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford B-MaxSpecificationMG MG3
FordMakeMG
B-MaxModelMG3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford B-MaxSpecificationMG MG3
13,8 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
171 km/hTop speed108 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
90 HPPower106 HP
125 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford B-MaxSpecificationMG MG3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford B-MaxSpecificationMG MG3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/75 R14; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford B-MaxSpecificationMG MG3
4077 mmLength4018 mm
1751 mmWidth1729 mm
1604 mmHeight1507 mm
1200 KgWeight1125 Kg
2489 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford B-Max and 2016 MG MG3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MG3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…