2017 • Ford
B-Max
Ford B-Max 1.0 EcoBoost (125 Hp) 2017Overall Score59.25/100
2017 Ford B-Max vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo Comfortline 2017 1.0 TSI 95 HPOverall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
B-MaxModelPolo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,2 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
189 km/hTop speed187 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
125 HPPower95 HP
170 NmTorque175 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears7
—TransmissionDSG
195/60 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford B-MaxSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4077 mmLength4053 mm
1751 mmWidth1751 mm
1604 mmHeight1446 mm
1204 KgWeight1180 kg
—Luggage capacity351 lt
2489 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford B-Max and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…