DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Aerostar vs 1997 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
AerostarModelTaurus
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,1 s
160 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
147 HPPower200 HP
224 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank61 lt
16 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/75 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength5016 mm
1820 mmWidth1854 mm
1850 mmHeight1400 mm
1530 KgWeight1522 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Aerostar and 1997 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…