DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Ford Aerostar vs 1994 Volkswagen Vento Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
AerostarModelVento
1994Model year1994
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
160 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
147 HPPower174 HP
224 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank55 lt
16 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4380 mm
1820 mmWidth1710 mm
1850 mmHeight1405 mm
1530 KgWeight1340 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Ford Aerostar and 1994 Volkswagen Vento approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…