1991 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1991Overall Score65.25/100
1991 Ford Aerostar vs 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Mitsubishi
Sigma
Mitsubishi Sigma 3.0 V6 (177 Hp) 1991Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford AerostarSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
FordMakeMitsubishi
AerostarModelSigma
1991Model year1991
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford AerostarSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
160 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
147 HPPower177 HP
224 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford AerostarSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank72 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
11 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford AerostarSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford AerostarSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
4440 mmLength4750 mm
1820 mmWidth1775 mm
1850 mmHeight1435 mm
1530 KgWeight1468 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 Ford Aerostar and 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…