DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Toro vs 2016 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeChevrolet
ToroModelCaptiva
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
197 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
174 HPPower184 HP
231 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
9Gears6
215/65 R16; 225/60 R17Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4915 mmLength4673 mm
1844 mmWidth1849 mm
1737 mmHeight1756 mm
1704 KgWeight—
2990 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Toro and 2016 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…