DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Fiat Tipo vs 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Tipo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMitsubishi
TipoModelSpace Runner
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
178 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1756 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
128 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 TTyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3958 mmLength4270 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1665 mm
1134 KgWeight1260 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Fiat Tipo and 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Tipo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…