DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Fiat Tempra vs 1996 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.

53.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeRenault
TempraModel19
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
185 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
113 HPPower90 HP
156 NmTorque131 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4354 mmLength4162 mm
1695 mmWidth1696 mm
1445 mmHeight1412 mm
1198 KgWeight965 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Fiat Tempra and 1996 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…