DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Fiat Tempra vs 1994 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMazda
TempraModel626
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
188 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1756 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower75 HP
140 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15 88 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4354 mmLength4700 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1445 mmHeight1400 mm
1168 KgWeight1265 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Fiat Tempra and 1994 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…