DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Fiat Stilo vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Stilo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeLand Rover
StiloModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
213 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
221 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4255 mmLength4433 mm
1755 mmWidth1809 mm
1525 mmHeight1709 mm
1320 KgWeight1550 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Fiat Stilo and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Stilo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…