DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Fiat Stilo vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Stilo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMitsubishi
StiloModelCarisma
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
255 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4255 mmLength4475 mm
1755 mmWidth1710 mm
1525 mmHeight1405 mm
1320 KgWeight1215 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Fiat Stilo and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Stilo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…