1987 • Fiat
Ritmo
Fiat Ritmo 2.0 (130 Hp) 1987Overall Score55.5/100
1987 Fiat Ritmo vs 1987 Opel Ascona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 2.0i GT (129 Hp) 1987Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Opel Ascona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
FiatMakeOpel
RitmoModelAscona
1987Model year1987
CoupeBody typeSedan
—Seats5
3Doors2/4
Performance
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
130 HPPower129 HP
0 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R14
Dimensions
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Ascona
—Length4366 mm
—Width1668 mm
—Height1395 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
—Wheelbase2574 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Fiat Ritmo and 1987 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…